In this week’s post Amy Raymond examines Egypt’s Asylum Law No. 164/2024. She argues that, despite being the country’s first domestic asylum law, it falls short of international refugee and human rights standards. The article explores the law’s failure to guarantee non-refoulement, its restrictions on fundamental rights, and the criminalisation of assistance to asylum seekers. Amy further analyses how the law’s structural weaknesses have contributed to an escalating crackdown on refugees and asylum seekers in Egypt.

In this post, Sky Kruger examines how amendments to South Africa’s refugee framework have introduced prohibitions on the political activities of refugees and asylum seekers. While these measures are framed as necessary to safeguard national security, preserve the integrity of an already strained asylum system, and maintain diplomatic relations, the post interrogates the broader implications of restricting political expression within a constitutional democracy.

In this post, Bhavya Johari explores how the African Court of Human and People’s Rights climate advisory opinion presents a special jurisprudential opportunity to articulate climate obligations not through mitigation burdens, but through the protection of collective rights and the decolonisation of resource governance.

In this post, Paul Mudau critically examines Zimbabwe’s surveillance laws, the extent to which they enable state monitoring of communications and the potential risks this poses to fundamental rights, including privacy, freedom of expression and political participation. The post further considers how expansive surveillance powers may affect electoral integrity, particularly in contexts where monitoring and data collection could be used to intimidate voters, suppress dissent, or undermine opposition activity.